If I said “Brontosaurus,” I guess I’d be reminded of a particularly long-necked, long-tailed sauropod. It was one of the few dinosaurs we learned of as a child—at least in my day—along with Tyrannosaurus rex, triceratops, therodacti. l and stegosaurus But brontosaurus as we know it is. really apatosaurus or… is it?
american scientist will kick us in with an explanation:
first time brontosaurus The genus was named in 1879 by renowned paleontologist Othniel Charles Marsh. Specimens are still on display in the Great Hall of Yale’s Peabody Museum of Natural History, however, in 1903 paleontologist Elmer Riggs found it. that brontosaurus Apparently the same as the surname apatosauruswhich Marsh first described in 1877 in such a case. Scientific naming rules state that the oldest names have a high priority. brontosaurus to another extinction
If scientists like us had known this all along in 1903, why did I, a child of the 1980s and 90s, grow up learning about dinosaurs that never seemed to exist? It seems that the museum is a museum. awesome Slow to adapt to changes and some flat out disagreeing that they should change at all. The image and name remain in pop culture, with an emphasis on Disney’s. Fantasia In the year 1940 and in land before time in 1988
before we know it We are adults, and our little children are learning about apatosaurusAnd we’re like, “No, no, that’s it. brontosaurus, Stupid!” Good luck in 2015. Another paleontologist decided. The two groups of fossils are different enough to classify them as separate species. So brontosaurus ever do Exist, maybe.