Home / Business / Amazon responds to Parler lawsuit citing violent Section 230 content

Amazon responds to Parler lawsuit citing violent Section 230 content



  • Amazon responded Tuesday, filed by Parler, accusing the tech giant of violating antitrust laws by banning the contentious social media platform from using Amazon Web Services.
  • In response, Amazon accused Parler of breaching the contract by refusing to remove more than 100 violent content snippets, including threats to murder Democrats, Republican technology executives and Black Lives Matter supporters.
  • Amazon also cited Section 230 as part of the defense of Parler’s claim that Amazon conspired with Twitter to hurt Parler’s business by kicking it out of AWS.
  • Big tech companies including Apple and Google cut ties with Parler this week amid revelations that right-wing rebels used social media platforms to organize and incite violence at the U.S. Capitol.
  • Visit Business Insider̵
    7;s homepage for more stories.

Amazon filed a response Tuesday to Parler’s antitrust lawsuit, arguing that social media that refused to remove violent content from the platform was in breach of its contract and that Parler was unable to prove any antitrust claims.

Parler sued Amazon on Monday after the tech giant booted its platform from its web hosting service Amazon Web Services amid a public outcry about Parler’s role in allowing right-wing rebels to organize and plan their weekly attacks. Ago in the US agency

“The case is not about suppressing speech or suppressing perspectives. But it’s not about conspiracy to veto trade, ”Amazon was quoted in the court filing. “But this case is about Parler’s illustrated reluctance and inability to delete … content that threatens public safety, for example by inciting and planning rape, torture and assassination of government officials and private citizens.”

Parlor did not respond to requests for comment on the matter.

Amazon cited more than a dozen snippets posted to Parler as violating Amazon policies.

“We are going to fight in the Civil War on January 20, form MILITIAS now and acquire a target,” said one post, according to the document, while another read. “White people need to ignite racial identity and cause suffering and Death is like a hurricane. “

Other Parler posts cited include death threats against prominent Democrats such as former President Barack Obama, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio- Cortez includes Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google’s parent company Alphabet.

Parlor users are also aimed at blacks, activists, Jews, teachers, media and professional sports leagues including the NBA, NFL, MLB and NHL.

Read more: Parler was taken offline for not filtering the threat. The screenshots show what supporters of Capitol riots posted before, during and after the unrest.

“There is no legal basis for agreement with AWS customers or forcing AWS to host content this way,” Amazon said, notifying Parler “repeatedly” from mid-November 2020 about content that violates the terms of both of its contracts. It was “both unwilling and unable” to erase it.

Amazon is also pushing back on Parler’s claims that Amazon’s actions are politically motivated and in violation of antitrust laws, with Twitter, which also uses AWS, and does not act in the same way.

“AWS does not host a Twitter feed, so it certainly cannot block access to Twitter content,” Amazon said in the filing, stating that Twitter ultimately blocked violent content, while Parler declined to act in a manner. same

Amazon also refers to Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives companies that operate “interactive computer services” the legal right to remove content as it sees fit.

Read more: Inside Parler’s rapid and mysterious rise, Twitter’s ‘free speech’ alternative, which created a platform for conservatives through Silicon Valley scripting

Parlor has gained prominence in recent months as mainstream social media sites have faced increasing pressure to crack down on hate speech, inaccurate information, and calls for “hate speech”. severe

After the US presidential election in November, Trump supporters flocked to alternative social networks, including Parlor, to plan election protests after Facebook and other websites banned groups pushing unfounded conspiracies. The truth From Nov. 3 to Nov. 9, Parler was downloaded approximately 530,000 times in the United States, according to Apptopia.

As pro-Trump mob violently seized the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday in an attack that killed five people, armed rioters used Parler and a conservative social media app. Another popular point of organizing Apptopia told Business Insider that Parler downloads have increased 323% of the average weekly volume since October.

But when details were released on how the rebels took advantage of Parler in the attack last week, the big tech companies faced pressure to cut ties, and Apple and Google pulled apps from its app stores when. Earlier this week, and Parler was forced to migrate web hosting to Epik, the domain registrar known for its far-right extremist content hosting – after booting from AWS.

LoadingSomething is loading


Source link