Home / Science / Book Hit: Is the Hunt for Tech Supreme Power Hurting Our Collective Humanity?

Book Hit: Is the Hunt for Tech Supreme Power Hurting Our Collective Humanity?

Stand up for humanity We have passed some useful points for Homosepians; Now this is the beginning of Gay Faber Era. The idea that “I Think I Am” has become uncommon in the new age of builders and builders. But does our passion for technology and its constant advancement manage to replace our human capabilities?

In his new book, The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers can’t Think the Way We Do, author and pioneering researcher of natural language processing Erik J Larson examines efforts to build computers that process. Information is the same as we do. And why are we far more from having AI equivalent to humans than most futures would be interested in?


Press Belknap

Excerpt from Artificial Intelligence Myth: Why Computers Think The Way We Can’t By Erik J Larson, published by The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Copyright © 2021 by Erik J. Larson, used with permission. All rights reserved.

Technology succeeded in the twentieth century. But the unbelievable response continues, as well, the famous philosopher Hannah Arendt from her phrase. In reference to the Nazi experiment, Nuremberg argues that Comte’s technology, which in the mid-twentieth century had certainly not lost its philosophical thinking – was no less. Redefining human nature, Arendt points out to the classic understanding of humanity. Homosepians – Indeed, philosophers – and historical focus on wisdom and knowledge rather than technical skills, and it is argued that the acceptance of technological science as a worldview is to redefine ourselves as Gay Faber – builder

Gay FaberIn Greek it is someone who believes so Techne – Knowledge of the craft or the making of things, the roots of technology – Determine who we are. Faberian understanding of human nature does not only fit in well. But with Comte’s nineteenth-century ideas about utopia technology. But also the 20th century’s fascination with more and more powerful technologies that ended with the grand project of building ourselves with artificial intelligence. The meaning of humanity remains intact.

Arendt argued that the seismic shift from wisdom and knowledge to technology and creation demonstrates a limited and potentially harmful understanding of ourselves, which would guarantee that not only But the development of technology will continue uncontrollably. Rather, we will see technology success as a more and more meaningful statement about ourselves, in other words, that we devalue ourselves to increase in addition to our smart or reasonable measure. About the wonders that can be created with the tools of technology.

Von Neumann’s initially vague comments about approaching “singularity” as technological advances accelerate more clearly in light of his contemporary Arendt stance. Although von Neumann was not a scientist and mathematician. (As far as we know) explains his speech further. But they perfectly reflect Arendt’s insistence on the profound importance of technology for ourselves and our future – for what technology philosophers call it. “The human condition.” Perhaps it seems a pervert for Comte that technology can accelerate beyond our control. But nowhere in his writings will be able to uncover the issues Arendt (and others) will do, in which advocating technology as the human answer to human problems. Are also involved in projects to redefine our understanding of ourselves. Turning to techne instead of saying wisdom (Knowledge of natural phenomena) or sapienne. The wisdom of human and social values ​​makes it difficult to convey meaningful ideas about human identity. (Even Air Bee, everyone is the creator in the case of hives)

Putting technae at the center also makes it possible to see a person as something that can be created, as it demonstrates that that person is nothing more than a superior ability to create advanced technology that Had been Once this path has begun, it is a short journey towards artificial intelligence. And here is the clear connection to the intelligence flaw first made by Turing, then expanded by Jack Good and others to date: Homo faber’s ultimate victory as a breed is to establish itself. Of course, this is the real goal of AI, exploring whether a project can be successful or not necessarily draws us into the depths of understanding our own nature.

All products recommended by Engadget are handpicked by our editorial team independently of our parent company.Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through a specific link, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Source link