Home / World / Britain seizes forced labor in Xinjiang accusing China of ‘torture’ and ‘vandalism’

Britain seizes forced labor in Xinjiang accusing China of ‘torture’ and ‘vandalism’



Dominic Rabb, Secretary of State and Minister for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs walks on Downing Street on September 3, 2019 in London, England.

Leon Neal | Getty Images News | Getty Images

LONDON – Britain has released new measures to eliminate alleged forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region in the British supply chain.

China is accused of extrajudicial killings of Uighur Muslims and other minorities in political re-education camps in the northwest autonomous region, along with surveillance of aggression, Uighur cultural restrictions and forced labor.

China has staunchly denied the allegations, claiming that the center aims to fight extremism and encourage professional development.

Companies with annual turnover of more than £ 36 million ($ 49.2 million) who fail to demonstrate sufficient diligence in keeping their supply chains free from forced labor under the Modern Slavery Act will: Must be adjusted In the council on Tuesday

“We have to make sure UK businesses are not part of the supply chain leading to the gates of detention camps in Xinjiang and to ensure that the products of human rights violations arise. In those camps did not end with The supermarket shelves we shop here at home week by week, ”Raab said.

In addition, the government will begin an urgent review of export controls to prevent exports, which may aid in human rights abuses, issue new recommendations to businesses operating in the region and expand the Modern Slavery Act. Also the government sector by barring any company forcing a labor relationship from public procurement contracts.

̵
6;Truly terrifying’

Raab argued that the evidence now “reached” and “painted a truly harrowing picture” accusing China of operating. “Prison camps, arbitrary detention, political re-education, forced labor, torture and forced sterilization all at the industrial level”

“It is truly horrible – the vandalism that we hope will be lost to another era of practice today as we speak in one of the leading members of the international community,” he added.

Raab cited a handful of accounts from diplomats and fleeing victims, satellite imagery showing factories inside concentration camps and mosque destruction, and third-party reports from the United Nations Human Rights Commission, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.

A spokesman for the Chinese Embassy in London did not respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

Raab stressed that China’s refusal to allow access to the United Nations Human Rights Commission or other trustworthy external bodies is incompatible with these arguments.

“China cannot deny access to all trusted third-party entities that can verify facts and at the same time maintain a credible denial stance,” he added.

Protesters outside the White House called on the United States to take action to stop the oppression of Uighurs and other Turkic residents on Aug. 14, 2020 in Washington, D.C.

Somodevilla Chips | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Raab’s measures stopped each Chinese official from being punished for their involvement in the alleged atrocities, and Labour’s shadowy foreign minister Lisa Nandy claimed her counterpart did not go far enough by analogy. Raab’s actions said

The presence of forced labor of Uighurs in international supply chains has been the target of many major governments in recent years.In late 2020, several U.S. companies have come under fire for allegedly lobbying for cuts. A two-party bill banning Xinjiang’s imports

“Some politicians in the United States have made up the so-called. “Forced labor” is distorted to restrict and oppress Chinese stakeholders and enterprises, as well as to control China’s development, “Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hua Chunying told CNBC in December.

“All ethnic groups in Xinjiang choose their occupation according to their own will and sign on. ‘Employment contract’ according to their own legal intent on the basis of equality “


Source link