Home / Health / ‘Cursed’ science shows COVID-19 is promising in the lab: experts

‘Cursed’ science shows COVID-19 is promising in the lab: experts



Two experts said Sunday the “cursed” science clearly pointed to the COVID-19 pandemic. It’s a human-made monster. which has been modified in the lab for maximum epidemic before attacking outside until disaster strikes.

Writing an opinion piece for The Wall Street Journal, Dr. Steven Key and Richard Muller point to two key pieces of evidence supporting the claim. which is getting more and more attention After being ridiculed for a long time, this was just a little speculation.

The first is related to the nature of work ability research. where microbiologists modify the viral genome to change its properties, such as making it more infectious or more deadly.

California government NEWSOM says he will not raise a state of emergency on June 1

5.

Out of 36 possible genome pairings, two of the amino acid arginine can be produced consecutively. This results in increased viral death. Often used in research on functional capacity is CGG-CGG or double CGG, written Quay and Muller.

“The selected insertion sequence is dual CGG,” said Quay, founder of Atossa Therapeutics and Muller, a former lead scientist at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory who now teaches physics at the University of California’s Berkeley campus.

“That’s because it’s readily available and convenient. And scientists have a lot of experience putting it together,” they write. “The additional advantage of a CGG sequence doubles over 35 possible options: it generates a useful signal that allows scientists to Follow up insertion in the laboratory”

The pair noted that no spontaneous double CGG sequences have ever been found among all coronaviruses with CoV-2 causing COVID-19.

But what Quay and Muller called “grim facts”, it was found in CoV-2.

“Proponents of animal-to-human origin have to explain why the novel coronavirus, when mutated or recombined, occurs to choose the least favorite combination, double CGG,” they write. What choices does the researcher get from the lab work to do?

“At least This fact — that all probable, random coronavirus is based on a rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers — implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be escaped from. laboratory”

An email recently revealed by Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s leading infectious disease expert. It shows that he was warned as early as January 2020 that the virus may have been “designed”.

Corona Virus: What You Need to Know

At a Senate hearing last month Fauci admitted that he could not be sure of the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. which is a country where the covid-19 virus Occurred in late 2019, did not provide a $600,000 pre-pandemic aid from the National Council. Health institutes towards work capacity research

The purpose of such grants is to consider whether coronavirus Can it be transmitted from bats to humans? Circumstances commonly suggested as the origin of COVID-19

In addition to the obvious signs of engineering received from the work, Quay and Muller wrote in the journal that the evidence “Most interestingly, the huge difference in the genetic diversity of CoV-2 compared to coronavirus responsible for SARS and MERS.”

SARS and MERS which has been confirmed to come from nature “Evolved rapidly while spreading throughout the human population. until the most extreme forms of contact dominated,” the couple wrote.

on the contrary Covid-19 virus It has been proven to be highly contagious since first detected.

Quay and Muller said, “Early optimization is unprecedented. And it shows that it takes long adaptations that occur before public release. Virus growth in human cells until maximum effect is achieved. That’s what job competence research is done.”

CLICK HERE FOR FULL CORONAVIRUS COVERAGE.

These two pieces of evidence led Quay and Muller to conclude that the likelihood of COVID-19 being created should be viewed as a leading theory.

“The presence of two CGG sequences provides strong evidence that gene splicing and the absence of polymorphism in public outbreaks indicate an acceleration of functional capacity,” they write. concluded that the virus was developed in the laboratory.”

To read more from the New York Post. click here.


Source link