The judge had ordered the Justice Department (DOJ) to open an internal memo from March 2019, which Attorney General Bill Barre at the time claimed was his reason not to charge former President Trump with obstruction of justice following an investigation of Mueller
The memo concluded that evidence gathered by a team of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team, which examined evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election, would not support the impediment to deter Trump.
“It’s time for the public to see that,” District Judge Amy Berman Jackson said at a hearing released Tuesday.
Some of the records for March 24, 2019 were released, but the DOJ now has two weeks to publish the full record after being ordered by the Citizens for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington (CREW). The document is a solicitor̵7;s personal advice prepared prior to a formal decision and is exempt from public record law under the client’s attorney’s rights.
But Jackson said the DOJ overshadowed the “real purpose of the record” and that the documents provided by the Legal Counselor (OLC) had “strategic advice as opposed to the law,” she said. All were aware of the predetermined results and the documents did not meet the department’s supervision “Preset”
FEDERAL JUDGE SLAMS AG BARR above the MUELLER report pledged to investigate irrelevant versions.
“Review of the documents shows that the attorney general was not involved in deciding whether the president should be charged obstructing justice or not, the fact that he would not be prosecuted is a given,” Jackson said. According to an order dated Monday.
Jackson, who was appointed to the federal district court in Washington, D.C. by former President Obama, wrote in a scathing ruling: The DOJ also disagrees with this court regarding the existence of a decision – establishing a process that should be protected by the privilege of a deliberate process. ”
In March 2019, Barr wrote to Congress that it reportedly concluded the Mueller’s investigation before it was made public and cleared Trump’s obstruction of justice.
Read the full letter
For Trump, who repeatedly tweeted that he was not colluding with the Russians amid allegations made by the media and of prominent political figures, the timing was almost entirely proof of evidence. Although Mueller noted that his report did not “refute” Trump on the impediment, Barr wrote: “Any further litigation is not recommended and the Special Counsel has not received a sealed indictment that has not been made public.”
Mueller later complained that Barr’s conclusion was completely unable to capture what he had discovered and led to. “Public confusion”
“The Special Counsel did not find Trump’s campaign or anyone involved to conspire or coordinate” with Russians working on those hacking efforts, according to Barr’s letter, “despite numerous proposals from Russian affiliates to assist the Trump campaign. ”
Click here for the FOX NEWS app.
Mueller did not find enough evidence to charge anyone in Trump’s campaign of criminal conspiracy, Barr and DOJ officials – who said there was insufficient evidence of the obstruction. According to Barr, the lack of evidence that Trump was involved in collusion would cut back on the deterrent case – which would depend on the president’s show of corruption.
Fox News’ Associated Press and Gregg Re contributed to this report.