Doublespeak, or euphemism, helps leaders avoid the cost of a lie while still leading people to their way of thinking.
Researchers at the University of Waterloo have found that using euphemisms is acceptable will make a better assessment of people̵7;s actions. For example, replacing the disagreeing word “torture” with something innocuous and meaningful to agree on. “Advanced investigation”
“As with the much-studied ‘fake news’ phenomenon, distorted language can be a tool to mislead the public, not by falsehood. It’s a strategic use of euphemism, ”says study lead author Alexander Walker and PhD candidate in Cognitive Psychology at Waterloo. It can be logically dishonest, so it protects them from the reputation costs associated with lying. “
As part of a series of studies examining the efficacy, consequences, and mechanisms of doublespeak in psychological contexts, the researchers examined how doublespeak’s use of language traits can be used to influence the assessment of the actions of people. Can people?
The researchers identified doublespeak as the use of strategic language to influence the opinions of others by expressing truth in a self-beneficial way. In doing so, the researchers assessed that the concurrence of the word substitution, for example, “Working in a meat processing plant” instead of disagreeing terms related to such meanings. “Working in the slaughterhouse”, which impacts the actions of the individual.
The researchers’ findings confirm that assessing public actions may be biased in predictable and self-serving ways when individuals use strategies to use more or less agree terms when describing actions.
“Our studies show how language can be strategically used to shape people’s opinions about events or actions,” Walker said. “With a lower level of risk, a person may be able to take advantage of language fluctuations, such as double speaking, which are often unresolved.”
Subject education “Controlling Storytelling: Euphoric Language Affects Action Judgments While Avoiding Perceptions of Dishonesty,” written by Walker, Waterloo Art School researcher, Jonathan Fu. Gelsang, Martin Turpin, Ethan Meyers, Derek Kohler and Jennifer Stolz appear in the journal. Cognition.
Research shows that BSers are more likely to fall into BS.
Alexander C. Walker et al. Controlling the narrative: euphoric language influences the judgment of action while avoiding the perception of dishonesty. Cognition (2021). DOI: 10.1016 / j.cognition.2021.104633
Provided by University of Waterloo
Reference: The truth about doublespeak: Is it lying or just persuasion? (2021, April 8) Retrieved April 8, 2021 from https://phys.org/news/2021-04-truth-doublespeak-lying-persuasive.html.
This document is copyrighted. In addition to fair agreements for personal study or research purposes, no part may be reproduced without written permission. The content is for information only.