Meghan Markle’s biographer has suggested that the Duchess of Sussex might be “wrong” about whether her son Archie will be offered a position under the protocol, according to reports.
Duchess of Sussex, spoke candidly about why her son, Prince Harry, Prince during an interview with two of the couple with Oprah Winfrey on. CBS In march
During the interview, Meghan, who was pregnant with the couple’s second child, said there was a royal conversation about whether the child would be in the position, telling Winfrey: “They said they didn’t want it. He is The prince or princess does not know what the gender will be, which will differ from the protocol and he will not be safe. “
According to the Duchess, the conversation about whether Archie will take the position and the security it receives is consistent with “concerns and conversations about darkness.”; [Archie’s] May the skin be when he was born ”.
Unlike his cousin, Prince George, Princess Charlotte and Prince Louis Archie, there are no names. But using the full name Archie Harrison, Mount Batten-Windsor
However, according to Omid Scobie, co-author of Finding freedomThe Duchess may misinterpret the ceremony, which determines who receives the title.
Speaking between the new Discovery + documentary Harry and Megan: Memories may vary.Scobie said: “ If we were to go as Meghan spoke to Oprah and what Wang said so far about the situation with Archie, perhaps one could assume Meghan was wrong in her interpretation. ”According to Deli Mail.
But the royal biographer also noted that there might be a lot more to this story, adding, “but we also know that there is a lot we don’t know.”
In 1917, King George V announced in a patent letter that only the royal descendants of the direct line of succession would have the right to take the form of a prince or princess and a royal. King, as well as the eldest son of the Prince of Wales.
However, in 2012, the Queen issued a patent for a new letter declaring that all children of Prince William and Kate Middleton would be entitled to the title of Prince or Princess.
According to the letter of the year. Prof. Archie 2460 is eligible for the prince when Prince Charles, father of Prince Harry became king, as he is the nephew of the king. At this time, the couple’s daughter will also be given the title of Princess.
However, during Meghan’s conversation with Winfrey, the Duchess claimed the royal family wanted to change the meeting so that Archie did not get the position, telling the TV presenter, “They want to change the meeting for Archie. ”
As Scobie suggested in the new film that the Duchess might have misinterpreted the royal laws. But he also spoke against the documentary, which auditioned “Body language, linguistics and forensic psychology specialists” to analyze the pivotal moments from both. CBS The documentary on Twitter on Saturday.
“If you’ve been here long enough, you know how I feel with the experts in body language and royal news (TLDR: Nonsense), so you can imagine how disappointed and surprised I was to see it. Yourself tonight The documentary focuses on that exact analytical style, ”he wrote.
In a follow-up tweet, the royal biographer continued: “ I tried to be cautious in the interviews I agreed to do, so when the production company presented a document considering the impact of the Oprah interview for that network. I respect (There are various contents Sound lineup) It sounds good, if I knew the truth, then my answer would be No. “