Roku warned us on Monday that this could happen this morning, the company announced that YouTube TV is no longer available on the Roku Channel Store.Google and Roku are arguing over a Roku holding deal, just as you can see on Roku. Old school cable TV shipping disputes The main point of the conflict appears to be with the AV1video codec, a new, more efficient video standard that appears to be a new standard in the future.
With the two companies unable to reach an agreement, Roku said the YouTube TV app, the $ 65-a-month service app that offers more than 85 cable TV channels, is not a regular YouTube app. From the Roku Channel Store, existing users will still be able to use the YouTube TV app on their Roku devices, but new users won’t be able to sign up. Here’s Roku’s full statement:
We are disappointed that Google allows our YouTube TV distribution agreement to expire.Roku has not requested one additional financial hearing from Google to renew YouTube TV.
We only made four simple promises from Google. First, don’t misrepresent consumer search results. Secondly, it does not require access to information that is not available to anyone else. Third, don’t take advantage of YouTube’s monopoly to force Roku to accept hardware terms that will increase the cost of consumers. Fourth, it does not operate in a discriminatory and anti-competitive manner against Roku.
As our contract expires, we have removed YouTube TV from our channel store. In order to continue to provide our users with great streaming experience, we are taking special steps to keep current subscribers able to access YouTube TV on the Roku platform unless Google takes the desired action that the channel is completely removed. Due to Google’s actions, new subscriptions will not be available until an agreement is reached.
It has been a long time ago that Google embraced the principle of making streaming so popular for millions of users by letting consumers control the streaming experience by embracing fair competition and ending opposition. The competition We believe that consumers will benefit from Google and that Roku has reached a fair deal that upholds these principles, and we remain committed to that goal.
Today, Google published a blog post in response, saying, “Although we did our best to reach an agreement in the best interests of our users, Roku was in bad faith terminated our deal amid our negotiations. Unfortunately, Roku has been involved in this often. With other streaming providers, “Google has completely denied Roku’s claims that Google wants user data and wants to modify its search, saying that. “For the sake of clarity, we have never made any requests to access user data or interfere with their alleged search results. This claim is unfounded and false.”
411 on the AV1
While these talks are likely to involve YouTube TV’s $ 65-per-month cable replacement service, Google says Roku “opted to use this as an opportunity to negotiate a separate deal that includes the parent app.” Of YouTube, which will not expire until December “
The statements from Google and Roku seem to be beating back and forth over the issue of AV1 video codec support, previously reported by the protocol exposed, are at the heart of the dispute. Roku accepts hardware terms that will increase the cost of consumers, “as Google said,”[o]Your agreement with partners contains technical requirements to ensure a high-quality experience on YouTube. “
Google continues, “Roku requests exceptions that will destroy the YouTube experience and limit our ability to update YouTube to fix problems or add new features, for example the lack of support for open video codecs. You won’t be able to watch YouTube in 4K HDR or 8K, even if you buy a Roku device that supports that resolution. ”It’s unclear why no one can write” AV1 “in a blog post. But this statement is about upcoming video codecs.
AV1 is the successor to Google’s VP8 and VP9 video codecs, and its development has moved from an internal Google project to the industry-sponsored “Alliance for Open Media”. AV1’s bandwidth-saving potential and royalty-free licenses have earned it support from almost all major video and hardware companies, including Google, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Microsoft, Samsung, Intel, Facebook, Arm, Hulu and many other companies. Like advanced video codecs, AV1 requires hardware decoding support for playback on slower devices such as streaming sticks, set-top boxes, and phones, so the specification is referenced. All “hardware” and “technical” Google has pushed manufacturers to pack the newest, more expensive SoC to be able to roll out support for AV1 to a wider audience.
Google is very enthusiastic about AV1, bandwidth is the primary cost of running YouTube, and anything that results in Google sending less data to play videos can save the company a lot of money.Google is aggressive. So much so about switching to AV1 that it created its own video transcoding chip to make encoding a huge YouTube video collection to AV1 easier.
Despite Google’s internal enthusiasm for AV1, when it comes to streaming hardware, Roku does a better job supporting AV1 than Google’s official scoreboard shows that Roku has one AV1-compatible device, the Roku Ultra. At $ 100, while Google sells the AV1 streaming device, it is Google’s newest and most expensive $ 50 Chromecast dongle with a Google TV.It doesn’t have an AV1-compatible chip.Google does provide AV1 support for Android TV devices, but it is Again, other third-party devices, Google should take the lead, according to the example here, but not.
No one can get the AV1 to work with an affordable streaming box, and Roku’s Ultra $ 100 is more about the cheapest AV1 streaming box on the market. But the company doesn’t seem to be able to offer the Roku Express at the current $ 29.99 MSRP if it has AV1 support.
While neither company saw the AV1 codec, Google said this didn’t necessarily result in YouTube TV being removed right away, the company said, “our offering for Roku is simple and still available. : Renew the YouTube TV Agreement under the existing reasonable terms.