Get Short URL
British oncologist and Norwegian virologist. working on the COVID-19 vaccine The origin of the deadly strain is believed to lie in ‘Gain of Function’ research, where the virus has been genetically engineered to provide new abilities to study transmission and reproduction.
Two senior vaccine researchers claimed that COVID-19 had a “fingerprint” of genetic “manipulation” and later attempted to conceal the lab’s origin.
Professor Angus Dalglish, an oncologist at St George’s Hospital School of Medicine in London. and Norwegian virologist Dr. Birger Sørensen has disclosed it before publication. MailOnline.
they wrote “SARS-Coronavirus-2 no reliable natural ancestors,” and the sequencing of the deadly species’ proteins showed “Above reasonable suspicion” that it was genetically modified. allegedly at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
“The laws of physics mean that you can’t have four positively charged amino acids in a row,” Dalglish told the news website. “The only way you can get this is if you make it yourself.”
The pair also detected what they believed to be a sign that the virus’ creators had further engineered it to look like a naturally occurring mutation.
“The species ‘appearing’ after January 2020 is unreliable,” the scientist wrote in the paper. “It’s been a year since we received initial evidence of retro engineering in China in early 2020.”
“We thought there was a retro-designed virus,” Dalgleish said. “They changed the virus and tried to make it sequential years ago.”
Scientists believe the origin of COVID-19 lies in ‘Gain of Function’ research, where the virus is genetically engineered to provide new capabilities for the purpose of studying the virus’s transmission and reproduction mechanisms.
Dr Anthony Fauci, chief medical adviser to President Joe Biden, was forced to defend $600,000 in aid. to the Wuhan Institute to the senators They said they had assured that the money would not be used for profit research from a function that was banned in the United States from 2014 to 2017.
“How do you know they’re not lying to you and spending money on functional research anyway?” Louisiana Senator John Kennedy asked Fauci. “You never know,” replied the doctor, but insisted that the scientists in the lab “Reliable”
Dalgleish and Sørensen first identified concerns last summer. After discovering suspicious traits in a deadly virus while working on a COVID-19 vaccine
The study’s publication coincides with a new effort in the US. In challenging the widely accepted theory that the new virus originated from wild animals sold for human consumption at a ‘bazaar’ in Wuhan, with bats or pangolins being the main suspects.
The report also accused China of “intentionally destroying, concealing or contaminating information” at the Wuhan Institute, and claimed that “Chinese scientists wishing to share their knowledge either failed to do so or disappeared.”
“It appears that the preserved virus content and related information have been destroyed. Therefore, we are faced with huge gaps in the data that cannot be filled,” Dalgleish and Sørensen write.
On the other hand, Beijing has consistently described the allegations as false. and called the investigation into the origin of the virus a “Political game”
Dalglish is no stranger to politics. Because he was a parliamentary candidate for the British Independence Party in the Sutton and Cheem seats in south London.