Home / Technology / Sigma fp L hands-on: small size, high resolution huge compromises

Sigma fp L hands-on: small size, high resolution huge compromises

Sigma makes a big splash with its original 24 megapixel FP with a cool body and high-end video capabilities. Including RAW recording, now it has released a $2,500 fp L with the same camera. But it has a much higher resolution 61 megapixel sensor. In addition to the camera, Sigma is also introducing an external electronic viewfinder. This is the feature that the original version requested the most.

As always, the Sigma fp L is the smallest full-frame mirrorless camera you can buy. more impressive than that It is the full frame version with the highest resolution. Relative to Sony’s A7R IV (which presumably has the same sensor), is the size too small for the sensor? I got a week with several of Sigma̵

7;s best lenses to find.

Gallery: Sigma fp L hands-on gallery | 25 pictures

The fp L is oddly shaped into a box like a compressed Leica rangefinder. Manual controls are sparse. with only the front dial to adjust the exposure settings. along with video recording Still/Video and an on-off switch at the top On the back there is another (Gaming) knob with a central “OK” button, as well as eight buttons for AE lock, quick menus, menus, modes, modes, colors, tones, display and playback.

The 24 megapixel resolution is designed as a video camera and a street camera. and a small square camera However, the fp L has a 61-megapixel sensor, so it’s not useful for video. (more coming soon) and better for portrait and landscape photography.

However, the lack of proper grip and tilt of the screen is a problem for those situations. While it’s small and not heavy compared to competitor cameras (427g vs 665 for the Sony A7R IV), it’s not very comfortable to hold. The lack of a handle makes it easy to drop. Although it has a tank-like structure

Another issue is that the 61-megapixel sensor begs for heavy, high-quality glass. For example, Sigma lent me an excellent 35mm f/1.2 GN DN Art lens. And it weighs 1,090 grams, or 2.4 pounds, without a good grip. Holding the camera and lens without a tripod or other support it is difficult

Sigma fp L full frame mirrorless camera

Steve Dent/Engadget

while manual controls are sparse. I thought the top and rear dials could handle most of my exposure settings, however, the rear dial’s D-pad controls were too sensitive. when trying to rotate to adjust the ISO or other settings I accidentally enabled the continuous focus setting.

With the fp L, Sigma has introduced an external electronic viewfinder EVF-11 that is also compatible with the original fp, attached to the side camera. Connect to HDMI and USB-C ports.

Connecting the EVF was difficult as I had to move the connector into the port and screw it onto a standard tripod-type receiver. which requires a lot of juggling Once connected, the 3.69 million dot display offers decent resolution. color accuracy and refresh speed It tilts 90 degrees all the way, making it usable for both normal and low-angle shots.

As for the touchscreen, it’s fairly bright and offers accurate colours. Unfortunately, it’s fixed so it doesn’t tilt or rotate, so I found it difficult to use for high and low angle shots. especially for video

Touch functionality is limited to focus selection. Like the older Sony cameras, however, it’s a bit backward and extremely inaccurate for that purpose. Since it doesn’t have a joystick So you have to use that or the rear dial/D-pad — and the latter is a bit slow too.

Sigma fp L full frame mirrorless camera

Steve Dent/Engadget

The menu is not well designed either. Since it’s hard to tell right away if you are in the main menu or the sub menu, therefore the quick menu will be your friend when you use this camera.

Performance is not ideal The specs aren’t too bad, with continuous shooting speeds of up to 10 fps, along with a new phase detection autofocus system that supports face and eye detection autofocus. However, although technology has changed, the AF system doesn’t lock. My subjects are fast and often fail to track moving objects. As a result, I missed a few shots, and many more were out of focus.

in any case The absence of a mechanical shutter means continuous shooting is almost impossible. Because this camera’s roll shutter is pretty bad. If you are trying to pan on a moving object You may get a lot of skew or distortion that renders the image unusable. The lack of built-in image stabilization doesn’t help. Because it forces you to rely on lens image stabilization, and many of the L-mount lenses you want to use on this camera lack that feature.

If you’re shooting subjects that aren’t moving too fast (such as landscapes or portraits), the fp L delivers image quality. The 61-megapixel sensor produces sharper photos than any other full-frame camera except Sony’s A7R IV.

Gallery: Sigma fp L image gallery | 53 Pictures

Colors and skin tones are clinically accurate. This makes it easy to warm or cool as needed. As always, the fp L delivers great JPEGs straight out of the camera. And there are several pre-set color modes (Nature, Portrait, Landscape, Black and White, etc.) that eliminate the need for post-processing.

RAW DNG files are easily customizable in the post. If you want to restore highlights or shadows, as with the Sony A7R IV, it’s not as bad as you’d expect in low light considering the small pixels. post

The fp L has great specs for video on paper, such as recording 4K 30p to 8-bit RAW DNG or H.264, or even 12-bit 4K RAW DNG recording if you plug in an SSD via the USB-C port. However, the 61-megapixel sensor. It has slower readout speeds and seven times the resolution you’d like for 4K, making it unsuitable for video.

Sigma seems to use oversampling rather than line skipping, as Sony did with the A7R IV, which produces very sharp video. But the rolling shutter is terrible because the sensor has a relatively slow reading speed. There’s less shutter release if you output video to an external recorder via the mini-HDMI port, but then it switches to a skip-line mode that delivers much smoother video.

In ideal circumstances (internal 12-bit RAW recording to the SSD without much camera or moving subjects), video quality should be stable. And as I saw myself You can seem like you can have decent dynamic range or good color accuracy. but not both

Source link