Home / US / Stephen Breyer is concerned about the Supreme Court’s public stance in today’s political era.

Stephen Breyer is concerned about the Supreme Court’s public stance in today’s political era.



In an extensive two-hour lecture at Harvard Law School, Breyer lamented the common practice by journalists, senators, and others on referring to judges by the president who appoints them and explains both. Nine, by their conservative or liberal approach to law.

“These are more than a straw in the wind,” Breyer, 82, said. “They reinforce the idea, likely already in readers’ minds, that most Supreme Court judges are political officials or politicians in the bloc. Rather than a jury, judges tend to believe that most judges’ differences do not reflect politics. But it’s a legal difference. That is not what the people think ”

Breyer also warned about the proposal to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine members currently. Public trust Over the centuries, he said, and discussions of any change should take into account the public’s acceptance of current court rulings, even conflicting cases, as in the Bushwo cases. The 2000 year of the election was the presidential election.

“People now expect the president to accept court decisions, including those with political conflicts,” he said. The management of the management in the event that the management strongly believes that it is correct ”

He said people “Where the original intuition may like … significant structural changes, such as …” Containing the courts “” should “think long and hard before embodying those changes in the law.”

Court expansion proposals have been raised by devastated liberal supporters of the Supreme Court’s long-standing conservative build and the relatively new 6-3 conservative make-up since Ruth Bae’s death. Durginsburg last fall and former President Donald Trump who chose Amy Coney Barrett as the Make her successful

Breyer is one of the three liberals. But he stressed on Tuesday that he believed his differences with colleagues were law-based rather than ideological or political.

Biden launched the first slate of a judicial nominee with a wide variety of options and made history.

Six of the court’s conservatives, appointed by the president of the Republican three liberal parties, with Democratic President Breyer said in his speech that decades earlier, such political references would not be part of. News coverage But decades before, there was no such neat political and ideological symmetry.

Republican nominees such as Judge John Paul Stevens, who served as President Gerald Ford in 1974, were also elected officials. Prof. Stevens, who retired in 2010, was the last in modern times when the president carefully scrutinized ideologies and judges, barely breaking expectations.

He also lamented the state of today’s screening of Senate candidates.

“The Senate confirmation process has changed over the past two or three decades, becoming more partisan with more segmented senators,” he said. It is too “liberal” or “conservative.” What they say, media reports to their voters, reinforce the view that politics is not a legal benefit that drives Supreme Court decisions. ”

Retirement rumors

Breyer’s speech, portrayed as he stands against the crimson backdrop of Harvard Law and continues on Zoom, reflects his broad reading of the constitutional guarantees as well as desire and The present fear of the judiciary

Breyer has written some of the most powerful comments on trying to save a landmark on abortion rights and school separation. Unlike his peers on the right, he also endorsed the government’s broad regulatory powers to protect workers, consumers and the environment.

Judge Clarence Thomas suggested the US should regulate Facebook, Google and Twitter.

A former law professor who never lost his academics, Breyer devoted most of his speech to the foundation of the High Court’s power before delving into some of his current concerns. “It was a long lecture,” he warned at the start of the event. Noting that he would be taking a break in the middle

He cited Capitol Hill service for late Massachusetts Democratic Senator Ted Kennedy in the 1970s and concluded with Albert Camus’ The Plague, which It was Breyer’s favorite before the country was seized by the coronavirus outbreak.

Since the January inauguration of President Joe Biden Breyer, who was appointed to the throne in 1994 by Democratic President Bill Clinton, has seen general news by fellow members. Democrats have called for him to retire, while Biden has a Democratic Senate majority, if only the tide. One vote

Breyer declined to talk about his retirement opportunities and on Tuesday avoided the topic altogether.

If Breyer, the eldest of nine, announces retirement in the coming months, he will give Biden the opportunity to appoint the country’s first black female judge, as Biden has sworn, that is unlikely to change the ideological look of. Bench But it enhances its diversity and youthfulness.

How the Supreme Court laid the path for Georgia's re-election law

Contradiction is ‘Failure’

The Harvard lecture on Tuesday is part of an annual event in honor of late Judge Antonin Scalia, Breyer advocating for a widely interpreted constitutional judicial approach as opposed to Scalia’s approach or It’s called originalism, which is linked to the understanding of the constitutionality of the 18th century.

But Breyer and Scalia, who died in 2016, were friends, and in a Tuesday lecture, Breyer joked about their appearance on the law school circuit.

During the nearly 27 years of his service in the High Court, Breyer has sought to connect ties with conservatives, saying he hates dissent and sees them as a “hated”. “Failure”

Who will the next Antonin Scalia be?  Conservatives fight for his legacy.

Some of Breyer’s most interesting comments should have been written in disagreement. For example, in 2007, he opposed the opinion of Chief Justice John Roberts rejecting plans to consolidate schools in Seattle and Louisville. Roberts said districts cannot consider student ethnicity when performing school assignments to reduce racial discrimination across the school districts.

“This is a judgment to be regretted by the court and the nation.” Breyer, his father, Irving Breyer, is a long-running San Francisco school board member. Breyer County said Roberts’ comments threatened the Brown v. Education Commission’s “promise” in 1954.

Breyer said on Tuesday that differences with his colleagues depend on their differing views on the structure of the constitution or how they interpret the rules. He made no reference to instances where his colleagues publicly questioned each other’s motives.

Breyer allows judges to sometimes weigh on public opinion or a future share of the decision. And he admits that all nine are the result of their individual backgrounds and experiences.

He said, “Judicial philosophy is not a code word for ‘politics.’


Source link