A judge in the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a New Hampshire lawsuit that accused Massachusetts of “failing to be slaughtered.” In an “unconstitutional attack on our sovereignty” on the taxation of remote workers during the COVID-19 pandemic, New Hampshire government Chris Sununu announced the case in Oct. Most judges in the court denied the appeal. The only two judges, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, disagreed on the matter, with more than 120,000 New Hampshire residents who have traveled to Massachusetts. every working day Many people work from home because of the epidemic. But still pay income tax in Massachusetts. before the epidemic Those workers only had to pay a 5% tax on the days they actually worked in the Commonwealth. The emergency rules passed in Massachusetts changed that and started. taxing them even if they are at home The governor of New Hampshire argued that was unfair. By saying that if they don̵
7;t use the tax fund service — they shouldn’t have to pay for them. “Massachusetts cannot balance its budget with our citizens. Punish our workers who decide to work from home and keep themselves and their families and those around them safe. New Hampshire has no choice but to seek relief in our nation’s supreme court,” Sunu Nu said in October. while the lawsuit was filed Government executive Charlie Baker did not comment on the issue.A judge in the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected a New Hampshire lawsuit that accused Massachusetts of “An attack on our constitutional sovereignty” on taxing remote workers during the COVID-19 pandemic.
New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu announced the lawsuit in October.
Most of the judges in the court rejected New Hampshire’s resignation to file the bill. Only two judges, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, disagreed.
At issue are more than 120,000 New Hampshire residents who used to travel to Massachusetts every weekday. Many people work from home because of the epidemic. But still pay income tax in Massachusetts.
before the epidemic Those workers only pay a 5% tax for the days they actually work in a Commonwealth country.
An emergency law passed in Massachusetts has changed that and started collecting taxes even while they were home.
The governor of New Hampshire argued that it was unfair. By saying that if they do not use the tax fund service. They shouldn’t have to pay for them.
“Massachusetts cannot balance the budget with our citizens. Punish our workers who decide to work from home. Keep yourself and your family and people around you safe. New Hampshire has no choice but to seek relief in our nation’s supreme court,” Sunu Nu said in October.
while the lawsuit was filed Government executive Charlie Baker did not comment on the issue.
Source link
