Home / Technology / The main reason why DSLR lenses should cost less

The main reason why DSLR lenses should cost less

For more stories like this Please subscribe to The Phoblographer.

If you’ve been following what the photo industry does You may have noticed such a trend. Back in 2014, we talked to a lot of people in the industry about the future of lenses. It used to be true that lenses can last up to ten years while cameras only last a few years. But that’s not the case anymore. Today, you’re in luck if your lenses last up to 10 years, and in some cases that’s certainly true. Camera technology has advanced all the time. And so are the megapixels on the sensor. But when DSLR cameras are about to run out, the price of many DSLR lenses should be high as well.

Many of these lenses can be given new life by adapting to mirrorless cameras. And of course, sensor technology allows us to adapt. Here̵

7;s a quote from Sigma in an article we did a while ago:

“But Sigma CEO Yamaki believes that lenses will remain with consumers for a long time. He tells us that improving lens dispersion power is more difficult than increasing sensor resolution. “That’s because lens manufacturing involves complex analog technology. and in order to improve the performance of such devices Small, thorough improvements are needed.”

“Mr. Yamaki stated that the sensor resolution will continue to increase. And the megapixel war is not over. But he believes the manufacturer’s line of lenses will slow advances in sensor technology. He reasoned that “…It is not easy to find a high-performance lens suitable for a very high-resolution camera. for manufacturers Producing a lens with high performance is very challenging.” He goes on to say that really good lenses. will be noticeably longer And normal lenses may have a shorter lifespan. but above all He believes that smart consumers choose good lenses in the first place.”

Back in 2014, DSLR cameras were far more dominant. And the advancements in lens innovation are far beyond what DSLR lenses can afford. The manufacturer states that lenses for mirrorless cameras are often more complex and better. If I keep saying all this I’ll repeat myself, so I’d like to ask you to consider a few key questions instead:

  • Who still buys a DSLR?

  • Why did you buy a DSLR?

  • Will those people buy more than one DSLR lens?

  • Why would they buy more than one DSLR lens?

  • What are the advantages of having more than one DSLR lens?

  • Why are you overlooking mirrorless cameras?

  • What is the point of DSLRs in a world where mirrorless cameras are the mainstay today?

  • Why should we hold an older camera? Is there a reason to actually use it?

  • Are there any emotional reasons to hold those cameras and lenses?

  • What can we do to give them new life besides switching to an infrared option?

  • Why are older DSLR lenses so much more expensive than some mirrorless options?

  • Why would I want to adapt those old lenses to my new camera? Do they have a special personality or are they unique?

  • if all this is the case Why would I want to buy these lenses brand new?

  • So why can’t manufacturers format these lenses and call them “their lenses?” “Classic product line” is not

To be honest, as I was typing those questions. I think I came up with an idea. The Canon RF 50mm f1.2 L USM Classic would be really cool. Then I mean getting the old lens from the DSLR and putting it in the body for a mirrorless camera, of course. The same applies to other lenses such as the 35mm f1.4 L USM II.

basically All of this means that the price of DSLR lenses will eventually drop. and they should be soon

Source link