Home / Sport / The nets would be disastrous if they hadn’t won against Harden.

The nets would be disastrous if they hadn’t won against Harden.

Now it’s a pretty simple equation for nets. Only one result was able to prove what they did on Wednesday afternoon.

They have to win the NBA.

They have to carry the parade route that will begin at Barclays Center, where the Atlantic meets Flatbush, culminating with a gathering in Boro Hall’s wide plaza, bathed in ticker tapes.Brooklyn Bridge maintains the entire festival. Proudly not far from Dodgers, the old headquarters on Montague Street.

Otherwise, the Sean Marks deal made on Wednesday would be down to the most ridiculous exchange in sports history. The Marks took James Harden to Brooklyn, teaming up with Kevin Durant and Kyriere. Irving decided to go back to work whenever Irving decided to

That would be a basketball to watch for as many nights. The Nets, already an already offensive carnival, could score 1

50 points on some nights. The Nets, already a defensive team, may have allowed it. 150 points on some nights It would be impossible not to watch

And that is swollen

But there is only one outcome acceptable at this point. When you eliminate three useful players – Caris LeVert, Jarrett Allen and Taurean Prince – and three unprotected No. 1 picks (2022, ’24, ’26) and four swaps (2021, ’23, ’25, ’27) for the 31-year-old who had questions in the playoff round who wanted to team up with Durant significantly to change that view.

There are only possible outcomes.

James Harden Trade Nets Rockets
The Nets acquired James Harden from the Rockets in the blockbuster trade.
NY Post Composite / NBAE via Getty Images.

Leading the Bucks to seven games in the Eastern Finals wasn’t enough, knocking out the Lakers in a memorable final? No, The Nets is not just all-in for the next few years, but for the rest of the decade. Their viability exists here and now, defined by a simple equation:

Parade or without a parade?

Even the Yankees threw all the chips in the middle of the table like this for all of their brave free agents. That’s just money So, Heat’s 2010 combination of LeBron James, Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh was a fierce maneuver that now looks quirky.

Perhaps the only other transaction that is in the same sentence is the Oct. 12, 1989 trade that returns Herschel Walker from Dallas to Minnesota in exchange for the eventual selection of eight future Vikings. The Cowboys have won two Super Bowls, the Vikings go 21-21 with Walker.

Next, it will look like Brock-for-Broglio, unless the Nets take the title.

Acquisition of Harden is not part of this, there are voices (included) suggesting whether the Nets are for a nominal price, having already imported Durant and Irving, they should be a dollar to break up with Harden.

But at this cost?

Former Nets GM Billy King was endlessly ridiculed for a deal he made in 2013 that brought Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce to Brooklyn and sent close friends to Boston and was right. must Mark has been hired to erase the memory of that mistake. In November, he actually said this:

“I think we want to build something sustainable here. This is not something that is a fleeting time, like a year or two from now, we are sitting here, for example. ‘Great, now we have to rebuild everything and we have no assets. To rebuild with ‘have that side of it “

It sounded good, and now it reads like a parody, like a joke, like a stupidity, and now it’s a common wonder of King-Marks that the Nets will go 14 years – 2014 to 2027 – without controlling the choice. First round Read that sentence again, staggering.

Perhaps Irving’s problems have spawned self-defense for the Marks.Perhaps the temptation of hurling these three talents together is worth ignoring Harden’s latest behavior, poisoning or Irving’s ongoing problem. No matter what they are

(And perhaps the Marks will likely do what Houston did soon after agreeing to the deal, swap LeVert with Indiana for Victor Oladipo, perhaps that deal is much smarter than this deal at a fraction of the cost.)

It is impossible to know

Only one thing is certain:

No team in sports history has ever had to win a championship to prove their existence until now.Until now, from this point forward, only the final result is allowed: Barclays to Borough Hall, O’Brien Trophy in tow

Anything else would be unacceptable, untrue: it has more than that:

Anything else would be a miserable failure.

Source link