Both sugar and sugar substitutes have been shown to be at higher risk for type 2 diabetes, which is to date. New research suggests One sugar substitute may not be responsible for the development of diabetes in healthy adults.
According to a new study published in the journal: MicrobiomeLed by researchers at The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and the Ohio State University College of Medicine, saccharin is one of the artificial sweeteners that should no longer be a concern about diabetes prevention. The study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture. (Related: One Vitamin Doctor Is Calling Everyone To Take Action Now)
Why did artificial sweeteners get such a bad reputation in the first place?
Saccharin is one of eight FDA-approved artificial sweeteners today, said Toby Amidor, MS, RD, CDN, FAND, award-winning nutrition expert and Wall Street Journal Best selling author of Best 3 ingredient cookbook.
For example, if you̵7;ve sprinkled Sweet n ‘Low in your coffee cup, you’ve tried too much of a sweetener. However, due to the use of no-calorie artificial sweeteners (NCAS) and increased sugar alcohols, which are used in many other keto-friendly and sugar-free food and drinks – research. It has repeatedly questioned the safety of these alternative sweeteners.
In addition to the fact that many are closed by the word “artificial” and are inherently suspected of causing harm to the body, there is science to support these fears.
“A number of epidemiological and intervention studies have shown a positive association between NCAS consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes and other adverse metabolic outcomes,” said George Kyriazis, MD. Ph.D., Assistant Professor of Biochemistry and Pharmacology at Ohio State And the senior author of the study told Eat this, not that!
Kyriazis said a particularly high-profile study, conducted exclusively on lab rats, found that NCAS induces rapid glucose intolerance, which leads to hyperglycemia, as noted by changes in the bacterial composition. In the intestines directly and undesirable
“However, from a scientific point of view, these variations and ambiguity results may reflect differences in NCAS using the characteristics of the studied population and accompanying diet or other methodological considerations associated with these reports. This, Kyriazis explained, “so our group separated these external variables and Design studies using both humans and rats that explored the independent effects of saccharin feeding on gut microflora and glucose regulation.“
“Additionally, the European Food Safety Authority, the FAO / WHO Joint Expert Committee on Food Additives, US FDA, and Food Standards Australia New Zealand, and Health Canada all discovered saccharin and a sweetener. 7 other low-calorie types for safety, ”Amidor said.
What did the study find?
The researchers asked 46 healthy adults aged 18 to 45 with a body mass index 25 (limit for the normal range) to take one of three capsules daily over a two-week period. Participants ate the maximum acceptable dose of lactisol per day. (Which inhibits the tongue tasting dessert) Saccharin with lactic acid or a placebo.
“We found no effect of saccharin supplementation on glycemic control and there was no change in the participants’ intestinal microflora,” Kyriazis said. It is more than twice the average consumption of the most avid saccharin consumer in the United States.“
For context, the maximum acceptable daily intake of saccharin is 400 milligrams, which is more than anyone would consume regularly, since artificial sweeteners are significantly sweeter than sugar.
“Since it’s 200-700 times sweeter than sugar, you just touch it to get the same sweetness as sugar,” says Amidor. “This study looked at the maximum amount of zaccharin, which was greater than everyone consumed at once.”
Kyriazis added that it’s important to state that their findings do not necessarily contradict previous reports showing the harmful metabolic effects of NCAS intake.
“They emphasize that high intake of NCAS can have adverse health effects caused by other physiological or dietary factors,” he explains, “so further action-oriented studies are needed in isolation. And identifies the physiological or lifestyle conditions that may endanger the use of NCAS. “
In short, healthy adults who consume occasional foods or drinks sweetened with saccharin should not be overly concerned about adverse long-term side effects.
To stay up-to-date with the latest food and health studies, be sure to subscribe to our newsletter.