Home / US / Trump did not return to Facebook and the Republicans were furious.

Trump did not return to Facebook and the Republicans were furious.

Home Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy issued a warning in response to Wednesday’s ruling that “the vast majority of Republicans will come to dominate technology over words.” Speak of us “

Now Facebook and CEO Mark Zuckerberg face up to six months of public controversy over Trump’s controversy they hope to put behind them.

“It exploded in their faces,” said Jim Steyer, CEO of the left-leaning group Common Sense Media, adding that basically the board told Facebook, “We’re kicking it back for it. you”

The oversight committee issued a mixed ruling Wednesday in support of Trump’s suspension, but ordered Facebook to review what the committee called the company’s “indiscriminate” and “vague” decisions that kept technology behavior. On the undeniable points found in January: Big claims must be made. But it has also been argued how to tackle the allegations that Trump used his platform to help spark the riots.

The immediate consequences – Trump’s ongoing absence from Facebook’s 2.7 billion member platform – Republican frustrations freaking out about the culture of repeal and the so-called tech industry allegations have. Favoritism with conservative groups And the ruling could do more lasting damage if it serves to unite Republicans with tactics to attack Silicon Valley companies and demographics.

There are indications that have already happened.

Republicans, dissatisfied with Trump’s latest social media, signaled Wednesday of a heated change in legislation that was once thought to be limitless to traditional business-friendly parties. All of this to reduce Facebook’s behavior.

Rep. Steve Scalise, No. 2 Republican, has lent a strong support in calls for Congress to improve US antitrust laws, which so far have gained traction among the anti-Big Tech populist groups. GOP. “Big Tech has a choice: it has the same standard for ALL, or we look at antitrust laws to limit their monopoly power,” he tweeted.

Sen. Roger Vickers of Mississippi, the top Republican on the Senate Commerce Committee, voiced his support for the law to treat social media companies as conventional service providers, a remarkable move. That may prevent them from separating certain users from their services. That echoed the latest recommendations from Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who used the latest case to express shock about “massive speech control in the hands of a handful of private individuals.”

“Even with ranks and voters in file But right now there is a serious distrust of the system, and I think that’s why you see the battle against Big Tech censorship as a major issue, ”said Jon Schweppe, director of government policy and affairs. America’s Principles Project, a conservative think tank.

Republican strategists and activists say lawmakers’ remarks symbolize the changing tide in the GOP to the power of big tech companies, which are beginning to converge in a possible way to counter companies. In silicon valley This includes efforts to improve US antitrust laws and to restore liability shields that protect digital platforms from litigation over user post content.

It was a breakthrough from the GOP’s onslaught against Silicon Valley during Trump’s era, which saw support for those changes only made significant steam during the final months of his tenure.

“Republicans are still moving in the past four years, openly defending Big Tech two years ago. [Sen.] “Josh Hawley limbs,” Schweppe said, “and now I think it’s become the main view of the party to do something. So we have to figure out what that particular policy will be. “

“Republicans are responding to the growing evidence of market distortions, power imbalances. [in Big Tech] And they’re looking at what tools are available. Said Rachel Boward, senior policy director at the Conservative Partnership Institute.

The Facebook oversight ruling caused immediate setbacks to Trump’s campaign fundraising efforts ahead of a 2024 action, with at least temporarily shutting down access to the platform’s powerful organizing tools. However, conservative leaders said Wednesday that the party can control allegations that Silicon Valley is blocking conservatives from mobilizing support before the mid-2022 and possibly even taking over the House.

“@Facebook, thanks for GOP mostly security in 2022,” tweeted Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.), A member of the conservative Freedom Caucus.

The test also gave Facebook critics an assertive expression on the left, which seized Wednesday’s ruling calling for government action against the platform. While the committee supported Trump’s ban on the account, which was in line with the long-standing wishes of some liberal supporters and officials, Democrats’ lawmakers said they felt no. Immensely impressed with the virtual trial And, they say, underscores the need for the federal government to take a more active role in moderating the platform rather than allowing Facebook to control itself.

“While this is a welcome step forward for Facebook, the truth is that bad actors still have the ability to exploit and arm the platform,” said Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.). “Ultimately, policymakers will have to address the root causes of these issues, including pushing for effective governance and moderation mechanisms to keep platforms accountable for business models that disseminate. Damaged in the real world “

Meanwhile, critics of the company warn that as long as a political lightning rod like Trump is at the center of Facebook’s problems, it might be difficult to find a deal in Washington on how to respond.

“When Donald Trump was in the conversation, we were talking about political speeches, we were talking about moderation, we were talking about each of the things people say,” not the broader structural issue of Rashad Robinson C. The CEO of the Racial Justice Group, the Colors of Change

Source link