LOS ANGELES – A campaign to remember the California Government Gavin Newsom has been shown to become a circus, just like the one that broke Gray Davis in 2003.
Axios reported Tuesday that Caitlyn Jenner, a former reality star and Olympic athlete and parent of the more famous Kardashian group, is considering entering the governor’s race if the recall petition does not qualify for the NBC News vote. Check if Jenner intends to work and she has not announced a decision.
Jenner may be the first in what many strategists believe to be an exotic celebrity and candidate who could closely mirror those who ran in 2003 when adult film star Mary Carey, a former child actor. Gary Coleman and Hustler publisher Larry Flynt added their names. On the list of more than 100 governors, the action hero Arnold Schwarzenegger finally won the election.
Nearly 20 years later, the comparison stopped there.
None of the contestants from the three Republicans announced their intention to run a nationwide name recognition similar to Schwarzenegger. Kevin Falcone, a former mayor of San Diego, is considered an unknown front-runner outside Southern California. Businessman John Cox lost to Newsom in 2018 with double digits and former Congressman Doug Oze briefly ran for governor in 2018 before he dropped out of the race.
“The greatest thing Newsom has to do is prevent Democrats from running,” said Rob Statsman, Republican strategist and former Schwarzenegger spokesman. say “So far so good. But now it’s easy too, we’ve been waiting for months.
The recall organizers said they collected more than 2 million signatures, more than 1.5 million needed to meet state criteria. The counties have until the end of the month to verify their signatures and report their counts to state election officials. It took the state finance department about 30 days to prepare cost estimates for elections before the Legal Committee reviewed the findings. Then the election day will be set.
If the recall qualifies for a ballot, voters will be asked two questions: The first is whether they want to remember Newsom, and the second, who should replace him.There is no limit to the number of people who can run. And whoever gets the most votes will win.
Since Davis was restored in 2003, California’s political landscape has shifted more to the left. The Republican voters registered were 35 percent of the voters in February 2003, according to the Secretary of State’s report this year, while this year accounted for 24 percent.
By contrast, 44 percent were registered as Democrats in 2003 and 46 percent this year in 2003.15 percent declined to say what party they were at. This year, 24 percent of voters registered under “Party Dislikes”.
“Politically, we were in a completely different position in 2003,” Democratic strategist Katie Merrill said on Wednesday during a Facebook Live discussion hosted by the Sacramento Press Club. Competing across the state, Republicans have effectively become third parties in California. ”
During the debate, Democratic strategist Ace Smith said: “It was a different time, we were in a very straightforward position. Trump’s have lost [its] way”
The shadow of former President Donald Trump, which has been repeatedly referred to as a type of political gangster, is another noteworthy difference between the Newsom efforts to restore and the campaign against Davis.
Since the ousting efforts of Newsom, California Democrats have rallied, thinking the campaign is bitterly swaying up the power of Trump’s loyalty over the loss. The White House for President Joe Biden
Last month, Newsom campaign consultant Dan Newman said the recall campaign was ` As Newsom said, supporters of Northern Whiteism and right-wing volunteers, including the Proud Boys, were among the supporters of the recall.
“We are just worried about the violence going into the future as we go further and further from the January riots and we have put in place safeguards. Any, “Newsom said on MSNBC last month.” What you want is about a quarter of the people who support Trump just sign the petition and it looks like they’ve done it. “
In 2003, Davis had no demons to distract. He had been involved in various crises when he won a second term in 2002, being heavily criticized for reacting too slowly to the energy crisis that affected more than a million residents in 2000 and 2001. Sorry but the collapse Ruin his reputation
Davis won re-election in 2002 with 47 percent of the vote.By 2003, only 27 percent of California voters approved his performance, the Los Angeles Times reported at the time. The option to commemorate Davis won 55 percent of the vote.
By contrast, 40 percent of respondents said they chose to remember Newsom, 79 percent of which identified as Republicans, according to a survey by the California Institute of Public Policy, a nonpartisan research organization. Newsom’s approval rating was also 53 percent higher than Davis among voters last month, compared with 42 percent who said they disapproved his performance.
“If there weren’t any other Democrats in the race and it still was – the economy was recovering, the coronavirus wouldn’t have spiked again and everything looked good – he wouldn’t be as popular as de. Vis, Stuttzman said.
Unlike Davis, whose administration was plagued by a $ 38 billion budget deficit, Newsom had a one-time surplus of $ 15 billion at the beginning of the year according to his 2021-22 budget proposal. With the pandemic, wealthy Californians made $ 185 billion in property sales, or the proceeds of property sales, which resulted in $ 18.5 billion in state tax revenue. Due to the surplus, Newsom’s plan will take $ 25 billion more than last year.
But record levels of homelessness and unemployment continue to plague California throughout the outbreak, and experts warn that this summer could bring another catastrophic cycle. Fire goes up and down in the state
As residents faced multiple crises, supporters remembered it was too soon to celebrate the victory.
“What a disconnect,” says fundraiser Anne Dunmore. “You’ve got people living on the streets flooded by their tents, and we’re bragging about the excess money or not to spend.”